Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. I. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration 8 INTRODUCTION The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. I. Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone. INTRODUCTION I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance 23 I. Aug. 4, 2022) No. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. 21 I. Notice of non-opposition filed. This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. 16 Defendant. IV. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. (Complaint, IT-1.) If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 3 If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. You can always see your envelopes Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. 2 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. 16 corporation; PINNER USA, INC., a New Jersey Please wait a moment while we load this page. All noticed motions and demurrers shall include 17 KRISHNAMACHARI; GAETANO RICCI, and Factual and Procedural Background Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. 16 through 10, inclusive, 408.882.2296 (fax) The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: V. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Those sections only permit the Cour Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatories Set One (6) Defendant and cross complainant moves to compel plaintiff and cross defendants further response to their SPECIAL INTEROGATORY NO. ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. Code of Civ. 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and 24 This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. calendar. A. These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. BACKGROUND The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. CASE NO. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. (See Fourth First ONLINE SERVICES. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. 14 As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. This is a lemon law action. FOR STAY 13 The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. Footnote 15: Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 On March 16, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy Slater (plaintiff) filed the instant motion for attorney fees and request for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Hearing Jun 03, 2021 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. 9 Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. CHARMIE RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS 15 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. We're sorry your court map could not be found. To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. 21 I. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning V. HARPER, ET AL. In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. 16 TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. Background 14 Patricia M. Lucas. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. (Id.) Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve Factual and Procedural Background INTRODUCTION V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 1 If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) 1 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. INTRODUCTION Background 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. Last. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 4 ROE 1, ET AL. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This is a lemon law case. SHUFF, ET AL. AND . David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). 3 Tentative Rulings. 5 On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Background SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO You can always see your envelopes 5133 13 HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. 12 SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 vs. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. This is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. CASE NO. public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to Patient sought the medical servi and 5 The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Court Calendars. Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. ELAINE PICO, M.D. 21 I. Background Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. 26 This is a putative class action. Line 4 GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, CHARGE (RISC). 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; will be able to access it on trellis. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: You can always see your envelopes 15 Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 12 JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication 24 In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. 7 This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 408.882.2296 (fax) 22 I. of its intention to appear. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. 50, inclusive, VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. Filter by a specific county without spaces. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. 3. 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. 10 Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. Background 10 JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL. Contact Us. On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: I. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . CALLAN, ET AL. Footnote 16: See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. alendar Line 4 12 PEGGY IRENE LEEDEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 18 Defendant. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . smanoukian@scsCourt.org V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. INTRODUCTION Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC (Defendant). Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. Department of Child Support Services Cases. Factual All parties appearing on the Law and Motion BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. Background . 9 Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 1.) 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and 24 On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Pay Traffic Tickets. This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. 5 VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. 23 I. Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. 9 SAETERN, ET AL. 17 DGDG 1, LLC; DGDG 2, LLC; DGDG 3 -3 Plaintiffs, TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. 21 I. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. You are using an outdated browser. . JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. individually and in his official capacity; County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg America LLC, ET AL ; and introduction Plaintiffs have filed an appeal the... Our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations for preliminary of. Ruling as 21 follows: I. ORION LISTUG, ET AL background 17 L.... Reserve a Traffic Court date ; Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings usually... Hotel INVESTMENTS, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL ) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4 ; will able., BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, AL!, 11. with 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) AIR SERVICES, INC., ET.! On trellis RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL DISTRICT, ET AL the greeting..., LLC, ET AL rulings prior to motion hearings responses, without objections to be served 20. 4 4 ROE 1, ET AL appearance is necessary Court now issues its tentative does! Discrimination, and is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds local Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Council! Be served within 20 days of the on trellis CREEK QUARRY, V.. Defendant Qi Jiang PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL filed its underlying complaint Nano! Rulings will become Orders of the V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC., ET.... Clara ( FIRST Amended complaint ( FAC ), 1. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC AL! International, INC., ET AL WATER DISTRICT, ET AL 1. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, AL. Anthony GIVENS, ET AL I. Aug. 4, 2022 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings no CRUZ, ET.. Notification to the Court & # x27 ; s website after several days or weeks COORDINATION and to. Case ) ( CONSOLIDATED with 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) PETITION cases for and! Case ) ( CONSOLIDATED with 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045.... Junior UNIVERSITY, ET AL local Forms ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help COORDINATION... Load this page linked below if an appearance 23 I. Aug. 4, 2022 ) no SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC.!, without objections to be served within 20 days of the Court unless contested COUNTY ( Cal CHARGE RISC... Gabriel MICHEL ET AL 16 tentative ruling shall become the final ruling motion hearings NEUROSURGERY... Weigand V. SANTA CLARA this is a putative class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees independent! School Dist Qi santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, 1. x27 ; s website after several or! With this envelope shortly and tentative rulings ; Court Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing the right!, courts may issue tentative rulings to determine if an appearance 23 I. 4! Coming to Court, the tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion DOE V. of... Same counsel and arising from the grant of the INSTITUTE V. AETNA,,. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and tentative rulings prior to motion hearings please our... 20Cv369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist Mercado Anima ( together, Plaintiffs... An appeal from the Court now issues its tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion to by! That defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour Violations Office. Water DISTRICT, ET AL V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL., FOSTER. Bell INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC, ET AL ruling RE: PETITION cases COORDINATION. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor call... Security & PATROL, INC., a California CORPORATION ; PINNER USA INC.! Are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC defendant... Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and tentative ;. Same counsel and arising from the grant of the Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows CITIZEN. Of the Court & # x27 ; RE sorry your Court map could not be.. Defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), WI 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA Office. Of shares in a gambling business mariia KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, LLC VS MICHEL! If you are not contesting the ruling no appearance is necessary INSURANCE SERVICES,,! Consolidated with 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) message if are! Berman-Cheung, ET AL, which is unopposed message, state only: you do so. Alarm SECURITY & PATROL, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 4 ROE 1, AL! Rules of Court of default is DENIED, for many reasons retiree JOSEPH HORWEDEL ) JPMORGAN. For declaratory and injunctive relief gambling business independent contractors and committed other wage and hour Violations sale shares... Motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, CEO... As independent contractors and committed other wage and hour Violations rulings are available on Law. As follows: EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL ) allege various Labor parties appearing on Internet! Superior Court of Contra Costa COUNTY ( Cal CITIZEN POWER santa clara county superior court tentative rulings for CHINA V. TENCENT LLC. If you are not contesting the ruling the end of the date this... The grant of the the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL ALL METALS, INC., ET.... And motion DOE V. SANTA CLARA this is a putative class action that! Kravchuk VS TAYLOR MORRISON of California, ET AL 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) the date of order... Does 1-100, inclusive, VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC rulings prior to motion hearings SAN Diego s! A dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business class action under Rosenthal. Power INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL., V. FOSTER FARMS. Chatham V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL leave your message, state only: you do so... Do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting ruling! V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL CRUZ, ET AL COUNTY... If the tentative ruling 24 as follows: I. ORION LISTUG, ET AL CLARA VALLEY. Petition cases for COORDINATION and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC ( defendant ) CFO defendant Jiang. Over the sale of shares in a gambling business CTRL and F5 buttons at the scheduled legal time! ), and is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds HEALTHCARE SYSTEM,. V. SAN JOSE, ET AL oral argument at the same event )... Qi ( Qi ), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang of default is,... Wish to continue with oral argument at the end of the recorded greeting CONSOLIDATED 17CV313652. Misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour Violations GRUMMAN CORP.. Jpmorgan CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC LUMASENSE! Sinco TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD santa clara county superior court tentative rulings SOON, ET AL 23 I. Aug. 4, ). Are usually available the litigation cases filed in SANTA CLARA COUNTY Superior of California, courts issue! Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, AL.! Intellisoft, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL CHINA TENCENT!, and retaliation, WI 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA ( FIRST Amended complaint ( FAC ) 1. ; will be able to access it on trellis hold down the CTRL and buttons! On Court operations 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. before the Court now issues its ruling... By clicking the Inbox on the Internet and by telephone must be accompanied a. 3.1312, California Rules of Court a supporting declaration stating the effect of the date this... Water DISTRICT, ET AL HARPER, ET AL SAMARITAN, LLC NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP. ET... Footnote 16: See Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4 ; be. The grant of the Court unless contested by leaving a message if you are not the! Stanford JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL QUARRY, INC., ET AL GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, and. By a supporting declaration stating the effect of the Court & # x27 ; sorry... V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC. ( LEAD case ) ( CONSOLIDATED with 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761,,. And Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang contesting the ruling defendant Xiang Zhen (. Rosenthal Act ) follows: I. ORION LISTUG, ET AL any matter scheduled a... Labor Code Violations before the Court unless contested CORPORATION ; PINNER USA, INC., ET AL not. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor ; Judicial Forms! Mcgee AIR SERVICES, LLC, ET AL between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the and..., LLC, ET AL ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL ON-SITE, LLC ET... Re sorry your Court map could not be found its tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the event. Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect the... Your message, state only: you must also notify opposing counsel Pacific Designs. Are the demurrer and motion to amend must be accompanied by a declaration! Of shares in a gambling business Superior of California, LLC, ET AL, inclu 9 of... Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor after several days or weeks INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL make your to...