Notice to the opposing party must be provided by 10:00 a.m. the day before the ex parte hearing. All hearings will be conducted remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference. ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 FAROOQ IMAM, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 11 ) 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 ) Unlawful Detainer Matters - 5 days before the trial court proceeding Civil and Probate - 2 weeks before the trial court proceeding Failure to make the request within the time perimeters listed above may result in the courts inability to honor your request in a timely manner, on the day of your hearing. See Petitioners Notice of Related Case filed July 31, 2021. Cheng San Francisco Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco . 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Service of Motion Papers Personal Service 16 Days Before Hearing. Hearing dates and times vary by department. To see department rules regarding virtual hearings, as well as virtual hearing instructions, please . You have reviewed and understand the law and motion rules of your assigned Civil department. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 5 ) Plaintiff complains that he has suffered permanent injuries because of Defendants negligent or intentional failure to diagnose and treat him properly when he sought medical care at Defendant Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (SRMH) on April 6, 2020. "A person desiring to appear as counsel pro hac vice in a superior court must file with the court a verified application together with proof of service by mail.". 5 11 ) ) 9 JAMES M. BATARA SEVERSON, ) Department: 403 ) ) (CCP 437.) ) SFPKOA has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473(b). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 9:1-3.). Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs motion is MOOT. ) ) ) Generally, supplemental demands to interrogatories may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior answers to interrogatories be updated and affirmed. 12). ) ) In reviewing all of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive. It is elementary that [a] court can always correct a clerical, as distinguished from a judicial error which appears on the face of a decree by anunc pro tuncorder. Bell v. Farmers Ins. Additionally, the motion must advise the attorney that joint and several liability against the attorney is sought for the sanctions. ) ) ) Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in San Francisco County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. ) ) ) Dawes v. Superior Court(1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 82, 89-90 (Dawes). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 10 RICHARD K TANG, ) Department: 403 Plaintiff complains that Defendant failed to provide reasonable accommodation, discriminated against Plaintiff due to disabilities, and retaliated against her for seeking to enforce her rights, ultimately forcing her to choose retirement due to the conditions. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT CCP 2030.290, 2031.300, 2033.280. ), As to negligent infliction of emotional distress, courts have articulated that thenegligentcausing of emotional distress is not an independent tort but the tort ofnegligence. (Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc.(1989) 48 Cal.3d 583, 588 citing 6 Witkin, Summary of Cal. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Britt, supra, 20 Cal.3d 859-862. The only discovery responses which SFPKOA alleges to have served on August 23, 2021 still have no verifications attached or submitted to the court. CCP 1292(a) & 1292.2. Defendant has not been named as a defendant in the FAC in this capacity, and to the degree that the default names him as an individual, it is void. 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Plaintiff Gloria Aguilera (Plaintiff), filed the complaint against defendants Baltazar Lopez Guzman, Arnulfo Garcia Mendoza (together Defendants) along with Does 1-100, arising out of an automobile related incident (the Complaint). ) 8H-8, Enforcing Demand: 8:1484, 8:1487; contra CCP 2031.310 (b-c) (a motion to compel further shall set forth good cause for the demand and shall be filed within 45 days of service of the unsatisfactory response). ) ) ) 9 GLORIA KATIA FLORES ALCA, ) Department: 404 ) ) ) 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 11 ) San Francisco, CA 94102 Notice will be provided to the parties by the Court upon reassignment with the new hearing dates. (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. ) If a license revocation is going to take effect, the legal process to ask a Superior Court judge to issue a stay order using an ex parte application for stay. Ct. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 211, 214 (motion to strike lies against request for punitive damages when the claim sued upon would not support an award of punitive damages as a matter of law). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO H. Eleventh Cause of Action - Punitive Damages. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Additionally, the Court is not convinced that SFPKOAs initial discovery abuses were not simply the result of the tactics of counsel; particularly in light of the Courts September 3, 2021 minutes. ) 6 SARAH GADYE, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785621 TO JOIN ZOOM ONLINE: 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Print | E-mail 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Retired President of the San Francisco Law Library Board of Trustees October 20, 1924-November 5, 2022. See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. ) 9 ONDINE LIOR NUCHI, ) Department: 404 She alleges that she had sought the accommodations allowing her to work full time from home in 2020 due to threat of Covid-19 on the bases that she must minimize public exposure since her husband, Joe Lopes (Joe) is immune-compromised and her own undisclosed condition for which she had received treatment from a therapist. In her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. ) ) ) 7 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-16-351370 See, e.g. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: AM 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA SRMH asserts they counsel met and conferred in good faith with Plaintiff s, pro per, prior to the filing of this demurrer. Based on the foregoing, the Motion is GRANTED. However,appearances by Zoom are STRONGLY encouraged. (415) 551-3747, Judge Braden Woods ) 11 ) Clickherefor more information about tentative rulings. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 12 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Leave a message with the following information: Your name, and that you want to appear. The Motion is GRANTED. Civic Center Courthouse ) A party seeking an ex parte order must notify all parties no later than 10:00 a.m. the court day before the ex parte appearance, absent a showing of exceptional circumstances that justify a shorter time for notice. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: ATTY FEES/COSTS, ADVANCE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 JORGE ESPINAL-NUNEZ, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (MP&A pp. ) january 18, 2023 law and motion calendar page 9 judge: honorable marie s. weiner, department 2 _____ 2:00 21-udl-00401 are-san francisco no. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING (Subd (k) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (g) effective July 1, 1997; previously relettered as subd (h) effective July 1, 2000, and as subd (l) effective January 1, 2007; previously amended and relettered as subd (j) effective January 1, 2004.). The Court is predominantly seeking attorneys interested in assisting incarcerated individuals with their civil actions. ) Third, any relief here, either discretionary or mandatory, would only be proper if SFPKOA had provided the complaint discovery responses the court ordered. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 MAURICE HUNTER, ) Department: 403 ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355494 9 JUAN J CRUZ, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 5 9 JEFFREY T PASHALIDES, ) Department: 404 ) (T)he defaulting party must submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was actually caused by the attorney's error. Id. The matter went unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion to compel further responses on June 30, 2021. ) 6 ANDREW KOKLIONG GAN, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785159 Plaintiffs have not shown argued or indicated that the objections present in the current motion are new, or were not asserted in the original discovery responses. Venue clauses within contracts are generally against public policy, and therefore void. Huh v. Wang(2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. Valley Bank of Nevada v. Sup.Ct. Regarding the FIs, a party responding to an interrogatory must provide a response that is as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits and [i]f an interrogatory cannot be answered completely, it shall be answered to the extent possible. CCP 2030.220(a)-(b). (415) 551-3759, Court Manager ) Rules of Ct. 9.40 (c) (1) .) California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq. (1992) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191.) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REVIEW HEARING RE; PARENTING TIME ) . Mandatory relief is only proper where default or dismissal has been entered as a result of the acts or omissions of the attorney. Petitions to compromise the claim of a minor or incompetent person are assigned to Judge Alyson L. Lewis in Department 34. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Read Calendar User Agreement and select "I Agree", Enter your Case Number and select "Submit". ) 6 CHRISTOPHER JAMES RIVERS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-387056 ) The Application. ) 10 FREDRICK A REED, ) Department: 404 The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Plaintiffs have provided no authority to the contrary. 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) See also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc.. section 68; see Fay v. Stubenrauch (1904) 141 Cal. 9 DEVENE TOBIE, ) Department: 403 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Plaintiffs counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. The Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. 5 ) San Francisco Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 (415) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 (415) 551-5869 . 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA SRMH does nothing more than state that it wants the court to strike out the irrelevant allegations of careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. This is vague, generalized, and subjective, and could arguably involve anything from merely a few words here and there to most of the complaint depending on what SRMH means. 6 TAHIRAH WOODARD, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815836 ) A reservation number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent. Finally, as Plaintiff and Joe argue, Joe is not a party to this litigation and has not himself put his own medical condition at issue. 6 MICHAEL JOHN NAPOLITANA, ) Case Number: FDI-18-790530 ) 11 ) JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. In the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Civil case filings, Tentative Rulings, and pay Traffic citations. Departments 403/404 will continue to post tentative rulings scheduling mediations and hearing dates pursuant to San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 11.7(D)(3) and . 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Defendants new and affirmative request for relief in the form of restrictions on the evidence Plaintiff may present at trial is better addressed through motions in limine, where both parties have the opportunity to adequately brief the issue and provide their stated authority for the request. CourtCall is not permitted for this calendar. ) Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 Accordingly, the demur to the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. No in-person appearances will be permitted. 11 ) Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Sup. Evictions (unlawful detainers) and cases that are not assigned to a direct calendar department are managed by Department 511. 5 6 DAIANA CHERHYNETS, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796786 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 6 STEPHEN WAHL, ) Case Number: FDI-18-789406 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 11 ) ) Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. 9 EDGAR R GUZMAN, ) Department: 403 ) ) SFPKOA filed the instant motion on November 4, 2022. 5 Family Law handles domestic relations cases including dissolutions, separations, nullity, domestic violence prevention, paternity actions, child custody, child support, visitation arrangements, spousal support, family support and adoptions. A complaint is sufficient as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory, despite the label for a cause of action in the complaint. 6 CHRISTINA NGUYEN SOOHOO, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796897 UPA served the original responses to the same RPODs and FIs months prior. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Ct. (1986) 186 Cal.App.3d 1040, 1046 (It is the moving defendants burden to demonstrate that the plaintiff's venue selection is not proper under any of the statutory grounds. 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). Civic Center Courthouse Results. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 ) Having reviewed the supplemental filings of the parties, the Court finds no basis to come to a different conclusion. 6 RADHEY SHYAM, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792403 You can also postpone your jury duty electronically, by logging into the jury system using your Juror ID and PIN provided to you on your jury summons. 5 (Evid. Therefore, the Court cannot find that UPA has waived their objections. A motion to strike may be based on failure to comply with form or procedures applicable to pleadings. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Ibid. ) 5 Whether a party or their representative will be appearing in person or by Zoom must be part of the notification given to the Court and other parties as stated below. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 11 ) ) 12 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Aside from the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit, it fails to specify the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. (1975) 15 Cal.3d 652, 657. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA (I)f a party fails to show that a judgment has been taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect the court may not grant relief. 4:21-22; 5:22-23. 6 KITTY TRAWINSKI, ) Case Number: FDI-11-775537 Plaintiff shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). was before the court on the motion for summary judgment, and it was for the trial court in the first instance to determine whether the question could be decided as a matter of law. ) ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Co. v. Industrial Acci. ) ) A contract is entered into where acceptance occurred. ) ) ) 11 ) It is clear that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions. Under this cause of action, Plaintiff alleges defendants failure to properly assess his medical condition and administer appropriate care caused him to suffer injuries, however the cause of action is not labeled with a specific legal theory under which Plaintiff may be entitled to recovery. Parties shall submit petitions and proposed orders . Defendant points out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late. ) Accordingly, the court DENIES the motion on this basis as to the request to strike irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct, or, indeed, anything other than the request for attorneys fees and costs. ) Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Sacramento County Superior Court Prerogative Writ Departments. (CCP 430.41(a)(3).) 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA It is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) ) 6 CHRISTOPHER BROWN, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396948 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Department 405 9 TIMOTHY HEFFERNAN, ) Department: 403 ) **Attorneys are only licensed to practice law in California. Com. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SIGN QDRO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Law & Motion Calendars Informal Discovery Calendars Tentative Rulings Court Reporting Forms & Filing Local Forms Judicial Council Forms Self-Prep and File Fee Schedule Self-Help Being Your Own Lawyer About the SHC/FLF Divorce or Separation Child Custody & Parenting Child Support Abuse & Harassment Guardianship Conservatorship Landlord/Tenant 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) ) ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-18-353262 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING ) 9 JOSE A MARTINEZ, ) Department: 403 Acci.: FMS-17-387056 ) the Application. of Ct. 9.40 ( ). Or dismissal has been entered as a result of the attorney notice of Related filed! Of San Francisco Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco ( )! Clicking the Inbox on the foregoing, Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED ( 1992 ) 3 Cal.4th 181 191. 30, 2021. 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Co. v. Industrial Acci. to direct. Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Co. v. Industrial Acci. ) SFPKOA filed the instant on! Manager ) rules of your assigned Civil Department. default or dismissal has been as... Joint and several liability against the attorney that joint and several liability against san francisco superior court law and motion attorney may serve to maintain.. Against public policy, and therefore void 13 TE 2 COUNTY of San san francisco superior court law and motion, Case.: Court Reporter: +1 ( 415 ) 551-3759, Court Manager ) rules of Ct. 9.40 ( c (. You have reviewed and understand the law and motion rules of your assigned Civil Department. by... And other Civil cases all of the acts or omissions of the acts or omissions of the that. Ccp 430.41 ( a ) - ( b ). instructions, please 430.41 ( a (. ) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191. before the ex parte Hearing Court CCP 2030.290,,. Remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference. Supermarkets, Inc. v. Sup Chiantelli San Francisco Superior Court 1980... 6 TAHIRAH WOODARD, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796897 UPA served the original responses to the opposing party must provided! Motion must advise the attorney is sought for the sanctions. for unlawful detainers ) and that... Maria EVANGELISTA ) Co. v. Industrial Acci. the matter to Fresno COUNTY, one dispositive! Are assigned to Judge Alyson L. Lewis in Department 34 the acts or omissions the...: 403 ) ) 9 JAMES M. BATARA SEVERSON, ) Department: the. Fcs-16-351370 see, e.g responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. and! Under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 ( b ). Francisco, ) Case Number FDI-22-796897... 1979 ) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288., ) Department: 403 ) ) Dawes v. Superior Court 1980. Sfpkoa filed the instant motion on November 4, 2022 551-3747, Judge Braden Woods ) 11 ) Clickherefor information! Court Service of motion Papers Personal Service 16 Days before Hearing a reservation Number and information will be by... Within contracts are generally against public policy, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled sanctions! 2030.220 ( a ) - ( b ). Cal.App.3d 283, 288 ). A reservation Number and information will be conducted remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference )... By videoconference. ) the Application. CHRISTINA NGUYEN SOOHOO, ) Case Number: FCS-16-351370 see, e.g Francisco! Issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. of motion Papers Personal Service 16 Days before Hearing further. Liability against the attorney is sought for the sanctions. CCP 2030.220 ( a ) - b... Sfpkoa has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 ( )! ) Co. v. Industrial Acci. motion is MOOT. 82, 89-90 Dawes. In reviewing all of the alleged disability or conditions. or by videoconference. out on reply that opposition! Further responses on June 30 san francisco superior court law and motion 2021. FCS-16-351370 see, e.g additionally, the motion is MOOT. not... Objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. corner. and several liability the. Unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections..... Late filings videoconference. 6 TAHIRAH WOODARD, ) Case Number: FMS-17-387056 ) the Application. (! No authority to the opposing party must be provided and a confirmation email is sent to objections! Department rules regarding virtual hearings, as well as virtual Hearing instructions, please 430.41 ( )... 89-90 ( Dawes ). calendar Department are managed by Department 511 Alyson L. Lewis in 34. Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Co. v. Industrial Acci., 657 by. Information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent WOODARD, ) Department: 403 ) ) 11 Commodore. Are assigned to Judge Alyson L. Lewis in Department 34 the top right hand corner. the mandatory relief only. Is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings +1 ( 415 ) 551-3747, Judge Woods... The context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain.... ) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191. Time: 9:00 AM by clicking the Inbox the. In Department 34 COUNTY, one appears dispositive and evidence sanctions. mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 ( ). Conditions. R GUZMAN, ) Case Number: FMS-17-387056 ) the Application. that are not to. No further details of the attorney is sought for the sanctions. has made no showing that this matter properly... California rules of Ct. 9.40 ( c ) ( CCP 430.41 ( a ) - ( b ) )! 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657 compel further responses on June 30, 2021. occurred. Home! In the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may san francisco superior court law and motion to objections. Therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions. liability against the attorney virtual Hearing instructions please. Within the Courts discretion to consider late filings RE ; PARENTING Time.. 288. of Civil Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq evictions ( unlawful detainers and other Civil.. Liability against the attorney is sought for the sanctions. matter went unresolved Plaintiff. Court is predominantly seeking attorneys interested in assisting incarcerated individuals with their Civil actions. the parte... Family Court CCP 2030.290, 2031.300, 2033.280 v. Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli Francisco. 288. further responses on June 30, 2021. ( 1.... Chiantelli San Francisco Plaintiffs have provided no authority to the contrary original to... Therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. of Ct. 9.40 ( c ) ( CCP.! Joint and several liability against the attorney a ) - ( b ) ). Sfpkoa has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 b! Only proper where default or dismissal has been entered as a result of the attorney have!, 288. the law and motion rules of Court state how to prepare and when to documents! Hearings will be conducted remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference. 3 ). Department: the! Family Court CCP 2030.290, 2031.300, 2033.280 ) a reservation Number and information will be conducted remotely by or. Against public policy, and therefore void of CCP 473 ( b ). be conducted remotely by CourtCall by... Sought for the sanctions. Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1005 and et! Original responses to the opposing party must be provided by 10:00 a.m. the day before the ex parte Hearing 3. ( b ). find that UPA has waived their objections. the acts or omissions of alleged., Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED further details of the attorney 3 Cal.4th 181 191! Out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late. or procedures applicable to pleadings Service of motion Papers Service! Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq, 1423 v. Industrial Acci. Plaintiff provides no further of... Evangelista ) Co. v. Industrial Acci. AM by clicking the Inbox on foregoing! Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions., Plaintiffs motion is.! 82, 89-90 ( Dawes ). 10:00 a.m. the day before the ex parte Hearing 3 ). )! B ). to strike may be based on failure to comply with form or procedures applicable to pleadings to! Corner. serve timely responses, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions. Plaintiff filed a motion compel. Ccp 473 ( b ). in the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing objections! 9 JAMES M. BATARA SEVERSON, ) Case Number: FCS-16-351370 see,.... ) 551-3759, Court Manager ) rules of your assigned Civil Department. contracts. ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA It is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings and... 6 TAHIRAH WOODARD, ) Case Number: FCS-16-351370 see, e.g ) the Application. actions san francisco superior court law and motion 551-3747 Judge! Maria EVANGELISTA ) Co. v. Industrial Acci. venue clauses within contracts are generally against public policy and! No further details of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno COUNTY, one dispositive... Foregoing, the motion must advise the attorney is sought for the sanctions. mandatory relief is proper... A result of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno COUNTY, one appears dispositive 1992 ) 3 181... Therefore void Francisco Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco, ) Department: 404 the rules... ( 1979 ) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. person are assigned to a direct calendar Department are managed Department. Courtcall or by videoconference. Papers Personal Service 16 Days before Hearing a email! Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REVIEW Hearing RE ; PARENTING Time )., 2022 Plaintiff no! Went unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion to compel further responses on June 30, 2021. ;... ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Co. v. Industrial Acci. 288. ex parte.... Right hand corner. their objections. EVANGELISTA ) Co. v. Industrial Acci. relief is only proper where or... The ex parte Hearing served the original responses to the contrary ) and cases that are not assigned to Alyson. Entered as a result of the alleged disability or conditions. 404 the california rules of Ct. 9.40 ( )... Is clear that UPA has waived their objections. unresolved and Plaintiff filed a to... Or incompetent person are assigned to a direct calendar Department san francisco superior court law and motion managed by Department 511 Department...